Skip to main content
All Reviews
Psychology
intermediate

When Will a Victim Be Secondarily Victimized? The Effect of Observer's Belief in a Just World, Victim's Innocence and Persistence of Suffering

Isabel Correia & Jorge Vala (2003)

Published
Dec 1, 2003
Journal
Social Justice Research · Vol. 16 · No. 4
DOI
10.1023/A:1026313716185

At a GlanceAI

Shows how observers’ belief in a just world shapes secondary victimization depending on victim innocence and ongoing suffering.

SummaryAI

This article examines when observers are more likely to “secondarily victimize” a target (e.g., derogate or blame the victim) as a function of the observer’s belief in a just world. It focuses on how two contextual cues—whether the victim is seen as innocent and whether the victim’s suffering persists—moderate these reactions. The work matters because it links a core justice motive (BJW) to harmful social judgments of victims, highlighting conditions under which just-world thinking may intensify rather than reduce support for victims. Its implications point to psychological mechanisms that can perpetuate stigma and unsympathetic responses, especially when suffering continues and threatens observers’ sense that the world is fair.

Method SnapshotAI

A social-psychological study testing how manipulated information about victim innocence and persistence of suffering interacts with observers’ just-world beliefs to predict victim-directed judgments.

BackgroundAI

Basic social psychology of attribution and justice motives, especially belief in a just world and victim-blaming/derogation.