Distinguishing BJW for self vs others shows BJW-self most reliably predicts lower distress and higher life satisfaction.
SummaryAI
This paper argues that links between belief in a just world (BJW) and well-being are clearer when separating BJW “for self” from BJW “for others/general.” Across two studies, BJW-self most consistently predicted lower depression and stress and higher life satisfaction, whereas BJW-other/general was less consistent. When Big Five personality traits were controlled, both BJW-self and BJW-other still predicted life satisfaction, but not depression or stress. The work implies BJW is multidimensional and that specifying the target of justice beliefs matters for understanding mental health correlates.
Method SnapshotAI
Two correlational survey studies measured BJW-self/BJW-other, well-being indicators, and Big Five traits and tested their predictive relations via multivariate analyses.
BackgroundAI
Basic knowledge of the belief in a just world construct, common well-being measures (stress, depression, life satisfaction), and Big Five personality.