Skip to main content
All Reviews
PsychologyWorth Reading
intermediate

Examining the Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Preliminary Report

Daniel Lakens et al. (2017)

Published
Mar 31, 2017
DOI
10.31222/osf.io/xfbjf

At a Glance

Can you even reproduce a meta-analysis from its own description? Often: no.

Summary

A preliminary audit of whether published meta-analyses in psychology can be reproduced from the information they report. The findings pointed to widespread problems: missing data, unclear coding decisions, insufficient reporting of methods and choices.

Note: this is a preliminary report from OSF. Later manuscript address the details.

Method Snapshot

methodological & statistical assessment based on the published data

Background

Understanding of the structure of meta-analyses

We often rely on meta-analyses, but: a) they often don’t provide their raw data (=> can’t be rechecked), b) they handle statistics in an extremely “loose” manner

ES