Skip to main content
All Reviews
Psychology
intermediate

What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives.

Steven L. Neuberg et al. (1997)

Published
Jun 1, 1997
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Vol. 72 · No. 6
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1396
View Original

At a GlanceAI

Clarifies what the Need for Closure Scale measures by distinguishing it from related epistemic motives.

SummaryAI

This article examines what the Need for Closure Scale actually captures and where it may be confounded with other, related epistemic motivations. By working toward sharper conceptual and measurement distinctions among these motives, it helps researchers interpret prior findings and design cleaner tests of “closure” versus adjacent constructs. The main implication is improved construct validity in research linking epistemic motivation to judgment and social perception. This is relevant to just-world belief work when epistemic motives (certainty, order, decisiveness) are treated as potential drivers of justice-related judgments.

Method SnapshotAI

Conceptual and psychometric evaluation of the Need for Closure Scale to differentiate it from related epistemic motive constructs.

BackgroundAI

Basic social/personality psychology of individual differences in epistemic motivation and psychological measurement/validity.

In Collections

Psychology41 papers

The Belief in a Just World

In this collection I gather (mostly) psychological studies devoted to people’s fundamental belief that the world is just. This construct, it seems to me, quite strongly affects our perception of the world and, importantly, our reaction to ongoing events — especially when we start blaming others, guided implicitly by precisely this motive. The collection includes both curated works, which at some point I read carefully and can say something sensible about, and new works being published on the topic.

ES
Evgeny Smirnov