Skip to main content
All Reviews
Psychology
intermediate

Victim’s innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world

Isabel Correia et al. (2007)

Published
Jan 1, 2007
Journal
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · Vol. 43 · No. 1
DOI
10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.010

At a GlanceAI

Shows how victim innocence and social categorization shape when people defensively protect their belief in a just world.

SummaryAI

The paper examines how threats to the belief in a just world (BJW) are influenced by whether a victim is seen as innocent and how the victim is socially categorized (e.g., as an ingroup vs outgroup member). It highlights that people’s reactions to victims are not only about the harm done, but also about managing the psychological discomfort created when injustice challenges the idea that people get what they deserve. By linking victim evaluation to social categorization processes, it helps explain when observers may be more likely to derogate, distance from, or otherwise respond defensively to victims. The implication is that perceptions of victims—and support for them—can systematically shift depending on identity boundaries and the perceived “deservingness” implied by innocence.

Method SnapshotAI

Experimental social psychology studies manipulating victim innocence and social categorization to assess responses tied to just-world threat.

BackgroundAI

Basic social psychology of attribution and intergroup processes, plus the belief in a just world framework.

Expert Review: Victim’s innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world | Marginalia