Skip to main content
All Reviews
PsychologyMust Read
beginner

We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research

Jowsey, Tanisha et al. (2025)

Published
Dec 17, 2025
Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
DOI
10.1177/10778004251401851

At a GlanceAI

419 qualitative researchers reject GenAI for reflexive analysis as methodologically incompatible and socially unjust.

SummaryAI

This position statement brings together 419 experienced qualitative researchers from 32 countries to oppose generative AI in reflexive qualitative research. The authors argue that approaches such as reflexive thematic analysis depend on a situated human researcher's subjective interpretation and reflexive engagement, making GenAI methodologically incongruent. They also frame rejection of GenAI as an issue of social and environmental justice, extending the debate beyond questions of analytic convenience or accuracy.

Method SnapshotAI

A multi-author position statement argues against using generative AI in reflexive qualitative analysis.

BackgroundAI

Foundational qualitative research methods, especially reflexivity and reflexive thematic analysis.

Debates, debates, debates... However, how strong are the arguments? (spoiler: nope; why? because the authors do not realize what LLMs really is and how to use it...)

ES